lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:36:40 -0500
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
Cc:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: block: Revert bio_clone() default behaviour

On Wed, Nov 06 2013 at  3:22pm -0500,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com> wrote:

> Quoting Kent Overstreet (2013-11-06 15:02:22)
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:11:30AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think the concept of bio ownership is still much too weak, at least
> > > for established users like MD and DM.  I don't know how to verify the
> > > sharing of bi_io_vec without some kind of reference counting on the
> > > iovec.
> > 
> > What's unclear about it? The rule is just - if you didn't allocate the biovec,
> > don't modify it or use bio_for_each_segment_all() (probably I didn't quite state
> > it clearly enough before though)
> 
> That part makes sense.  The new rule that scares me is that we can't
> free the src of the clone until all the clones are freed.  If it works
> with today's existing users it feels like it is more by accident than
> design.  I'm not saying we can't do it, we just need some bigger
> flashing warning lights.

But we probably don't want those warning lights to come with the cost of
managing extra refcounts in the fast path -- so maybe a debug-only
refcount?

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ