linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: Revert bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131106050745.GA17641@moria.home.lan>
Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2013 21:07:45 -0800
From:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Revert bio_clone() default behaviour

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:02:19PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com> wrote:
> 
> > Chris, Olaf, can you two in particular test this? I have tested the bounce
> > buffer code (and bcache), but Jens told me today there was an md bug that I
> > _still_ can't find any emails about so I'm not sure what to test for that.
> 
> (I'm guessing you mean me and not some German person here. :-)
> 
> What is this expected to apply on top of? It doesn't apply cleanly on
> the 20131105 -next tree which is where I had been seeing the issues.

Sorry - it's on top of Jens' for-3.13/core branch,
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/