[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131106211604.GM5661@alberich>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:16:04 +0100
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann@...xeda.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: Switch slub_debug kernel option to early_param
to avoid boot panic
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 09:34:29PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:54:17PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > When I've used slub_debug kernel option (e.g.
> > > > "slub_debug=,skbuff_fclone_cache" or similar) on a debug session I've
> > > > seen a panic like:
> > >
> > > Hmmm.. That looks like its due to some slabs not having names
> > > during early boot. kmem_cache_flags is called with NULL as a parameter.
> >
> > That's because the slub_debug parameter is not evaluated before
> > kmem_cache_flags is called.
> >
> > Older kernels didn't show this problem. I think the sequence of those
> > calls has changed. Not sure what patch set has made that change.
>
> Please ignore this comment.
> I revisisted the code and of course you are right.
> Hmm, now wondering why my patch covered the panic.
Arrgh, my patch changed slub_debug_slabs to be NULL.
That is why the panic didn't happen.
Would be nice, if your patch is pushed upstream asap.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists