| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:42:21 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Figo.zhang" <figo1802@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] MCS Lock: Allow architecture specific memory
barrier in lock/unlock
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 13:37 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> This patch moves the decision of what kind of memory barriers to be
> used in the MCS lock and unlock functions to the architecture specific
> layer. It also moves the actual lock/unlock code to mcs_spinlock.c
> file.
>
> A full memory barrier will be used if the following macros are not
> defined:
> 1) smp_mb__before_critical_section()
> 2) smp_mb__after_critical_section()
>
> For the x86 architecture, only compiler barrier will be needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Should be Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 6 +++
> include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h | 78 +-------------------------------------
> kernel/mcs_spinlock.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> index c6cd358..6d0172c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@
> #endif
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
> #define set_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0)
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE)
> +# define smp_mb__before_critical_section() barrier()
> +# define smp_mb__after_critical_section() barrier()
> +#endif
> +
> #else
> #define smp_mb() barrier()
> #define smp_rmb() barrier()
> diff --git a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> index f2c71e8..d54bb23 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mcs_spinlock.h
> @@ -12,19 +12,6 @@
> #ifndef __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> #define __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
>
> -/*
> - * asm/processor.h may define arch_mutex_cpu_relax().
> - * If it is not defined, cpu_relax() will be used.
> - */
> -#include <asm/barrier.h>
> -#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> -#include <asm/processor.h>
> -#include <linux/compiler.h>
> -
> -#ifndef arch_mutex_cpu_relax
> -# define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> -#endif
> -
> struct mcs_spinlock {
> struct mcs_spinlock *next;
> int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
> @@ -32,68 +19,7 @@ struct mcs_spinlock {
>
> extern
> void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node);
> -
> -/*
> - * In order to acquire the lock, the caller should declare a local node and
> - * pass a reference of the node to this function in addition to the lock.
> - * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
> - * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
> - * in mcs_spin_unlock().
> - *
> - * The _raw_mcs_spin_lock() function should not be called directly. Instead,
> - * users should call mcs_spin_lock().
> - */
> -static inline
> -void _raw_mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> -{
> - struct mcs_spinlock *prev;
> -
> - /* Init node */
> - node->locked = 0;
> - node->next = NULL;
> -
> - /* xchg() provides a memory barrier */
> - prev = xchg(lock, node);
> - if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> - /* Lock acquired */
> - return;
> - }
> - ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> - /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
> - while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
> - arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> -
> - /* Make sure subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired */
> - smp_rmb();
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Releases the lock. The caller should pass in the corresponding node that
> - * was used to acquire the lock.
> - */
> -static inline
> -void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> -{
> - struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> -
> - if (likely(!next)) {
> - /*
> - * cmpxchg() provides a memory barrier.
> - * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> - */
> - if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
> - return;
> - /* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> - while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
> - arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * Make sure all operations within the critical section
> - * happen before the lock is released.
> - */
> - smp_wmb();
> - }
> - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
> -}
> +extern
> +void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node);
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c
> index 3c55626..2dfd207 100644
> --- a/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/mcs_spinlock.c
> @@ -7,15 +7,90 @@
> * It avoids expensive cache bouncings that common test-and-set spin-lock
> * implementations incur.
> */
> +/*
> + * asm/processor.h may define arch_mutex_cpu_relax().
> + * If it is not defined, cpu_relax() will be used.
> + */
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/mcs_spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
>
> +#ifndef arch_mutex_cpu_relax
> +# define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> - * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
> - * time spent in this lock function.
> + * Fall back to use full memory barrier if those macros are not defined
> + * in a architecture specific header file.
> + */
> +#ifndef smp_mb__before_critical_section
> +#define smp_mb__before_critical_section() smp_mb()
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef smp_mb__after_critical_section
> +#define smp_mb__after_critical_section() smp_mb()
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * In order to acquire the lock, the caller should declare a local node and
> + * pass a reference of the node to this function in addition to the lock.
> + * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
> + * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
> + * in mcs_spin_unlock().
> */
> void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> {
> - _raw_mcs_spin_lock(lock, node);
> + struct mcs_spinlock *prev;
> +
> + /* Init node */
> + node->locked = 0;
> + node->next = NULL;
> +
> + /* xchg() provides a memory barrier */
> + prev = xchg(lock, node);
> + if (likely(prev == NULL)) {
> + /* Lock acquired */
> + return;
> + }
> + ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
> + /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
> + while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
> + arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> +
> + /* Make sure subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired */
> + smp_mb__before_critical_section();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mcs_spin_lock);
> +
> +/*
> + * Releases the lock. The caller should pass in the corresponding node that
> + * was used to acquire the lock.
> + */
> +void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> +{
> + struct mcs_spinlock *next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
> +
> + if (likely(!next)) {
> + /*
> + * cmpxchg() provides a memory barrier.
> + * Release the lock by setting it to NULL
> + */
> + if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
> + return;
> + /* Wait until the next pointer is set */
> + while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
> + arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Make sure all operations within the critical section
> + * happen before the lock is released.
> + */
> + smp_mb__after_critical_section();
> + }
> + ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mcs_spin_unlock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists