[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1311061656250.27317@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:00:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: a different perf tracepoint bug
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > [11559.476002] <<EOE>> <IRQ> [<ffffffff8104acaa>] ? __send_signal+0xd8/0x26f
>
> Can you find the exact location of __send_signal()?
I'm not sure what you mean, but:
addr2line -e ./vmlinux ffffffff8104acaa
linux-kernel/linux-3.12/kernel/signal.c:1095
which is
q = __sigqueue_alloc(sig, t, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOTRACK_FALSE_POSITIVE,
override_rlimit);
--> if (q) {
list_add_tail(&q->list, &pending->list);
switch ((unsigned long) info) {
case (unsigned long) SEND_SIG_NOINFO:
...
though this might just be a case where tracepoints are happening too
quickly and the kernel gets stuck and can't keep up. Previously I was
using a hacked kernel that made the watchdog continually print rather than
just warn once, the better to see if any progress was being made.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists