[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131106151604.c2f85c3463e663cc27fd4eaf@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:16:04 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
EXT4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree/test: test
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe()
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:37:23 -0800 Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> ...
>
> --- a/lib/rbtree_test.c
> +++ b/lib/rbtree_test.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ static int black_path_count(struct rb_node *rb)
> return count;
> }
>
> +static void check_postorder_foreach(int nr_nodes)
> +{
> + struct test_node *cur, *n;
> + int count = 0;
> + rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(cur, n, &root, rb)
> + count++;
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(count != nr_nodes);
> +}
> +
> static void check_postorder(int nr_nodes)
> {
> struct rb_node *rb;
> @@ -148,6 +158,7 @@ static void check(int nr_nodes)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(count < (1 << black_path_count(rb_last(&root))) - 1);
>
> check_postorder(nr_nodes);
> + check_postorder_foreach(nr_nodes);
> }
>
> static void check_augmented(int nr_nodes)
I'm rather confused about where this fits with the other (and
apparently withdrawn) patches.
Please resend everything?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists