[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9EACCDDB-4DD2-4166-AB04-6C9CF413D187@antoniou-consulting.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:24:52 +0200
From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Alison Chaiken <Alison_Chaiken@...tor.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
Jan Lubbe <jluebbe@...net.de>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@....com>,
Michael Stickel <ms@...able.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>,
Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 - V2] Introducing Device Tree Overlays
Hi Sebastian,
On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 06.11.13, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> It has been discussed.
>>>
>>> We are doing it because
>
> Please don't get me wrong. I am not against this, I am just curious why
> this needs to be done at runtime and bootloader time is not an option.
>
No harm done.
I guess it all comes down to being done at runtime being the better option.
> Sebastian
Regards
-- Pantelis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists