[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131107090844.GA719@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:08:44 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] static_key: WARN on usage before
jump_label_init was called
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 01:50:27 +0100
> Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Sorry for the late reply, but this was sent while I was getting ready
> > > for my two week conference trip.
> > >
> > > Note, this should not go through the net tree, but instead should go
> > > through tip, as it deals with jump labels and not networking.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, this patch looks good.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > Thanks for the review!
> >
> > The patch already got queued up in net-next. Is this ok or what do you
> > suggest to resolve this?
> >
>
> I'm fine, but really. Changes need to go through the trees they are
> maintained by. Would Dave Miller like it if I pushed patches that
> touched the net directory without a single Ack?
I second that concern.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists