[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383835070.30870.9.camel@smile>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:37:50 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] dmatest: gather test results in the linked list
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 10:11 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> [ excuse the resend, always forget that mobile-gmail sends html by default ]
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 11:58 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > The patch provides a storage for the test results in the linked list. The
> >> > gathered data could be used after test is done.
> >> >
> >> > The new file 'results' represents gathered data of the in progress test. The
> >> > messages collected are printed to the kernel log as well.
> >> >
> >> > Example of output:
> >> > % cat /sys/kernel/debug/dmatest/results
> >> > dma0chan0-copy0: #1: No errors with src_off=0x7bf dst_off=0x8ad len=0x3fea (0)
> >> >
> >> > The message format is unified across the different types of errors. A number in
> >> > the parens represents additional information, e.g. error code, error counter,
> >> > or status.
> >> >
> >> > Note that the buffer comparison is done in the old way, i.e. data is not
> >> > collected and just printed out.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I need to revert this to get my testing done as it just leaks memory
> >> for no real benefit that I can see. Outside of making the log
> >> messages have a uniform format I'm not seeing the case for this? I'll
> >> revert and add a pr_fmt to make dmatest messages readily parseable.
> >
> >
> > The benefit of it is to access to the results asynchronously as many
> > times as tester wants to.
> >
>
> tail -f /var/log/messages is also asynchronous.
It's harder to collect them by the script.
>
> > Actually I wonder where you found memory leak. It keeps the result only
> > for the last test run.
>
> In my test I hit the oom killer allocating the "OK" results.
Any description and steps you can share to reproduce your test?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists