[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK6Q_CZTvKo3xT9CEjJ5qyMAP2qHby1YPCg4b72aRUNBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:54:09 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
libseccomp-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ARM audit, seccomp, etc are broken wrt OABI syscalls
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<hmh@....eng.br> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Maybe the thing to do is to put a warning in the config text for
>> CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT that describes the problems (malicious userspace
>> can confuse syscall auditors, strace, etc.), change the "if in doubt"
>> part to N, and disable seccomp filters if CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT. That
>> might even get Debian to change their default.
>
> Bug reported to the Debian BTS: #728975
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728975
FWIW, Ubuntu has also now disabled OABI_COMPAT going forward:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2013-November/034242.html
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists