[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4433736.xh14GOaN7a@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:57:41 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: fix requested_freq reduction issue
On Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:39:38 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 07:58, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com> wrote:
> > When decreasing frequency, requested_freq may be less than
> > freq_target, So requested_freq minus freq_target may be negative,
> > But reqested_freq's unit is unsigned int, then the negative result
> > will be one larger interger which may be even higher than
> > requested_freq.
> >
> > This patch is to fix such issue. when result becomes negative,
> > set requested_freq as the min value of policy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Good Catch.
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Applied, thanks!
> We need another patch for fixing the other part of code where we
> increase freq..
> We need to replace:
>
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq == policy->max)
> return;
>
> with
>
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq >= policy->max)
> return;
>
> So, that we don't run unnecessary code :)
Care to prepare a patch?
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists