[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h61s4dkqs.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:23:23 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hda_intel: ratelimit "spurious response" message
At Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:55:15 -0800,
Joe Perches wrote:
>
> dmesg here has a 100+ consecutive lines of:
>
> [ 1464.219446] hda-intel 0000:00:14.2: spurious response 0x0:0x0, last cmd=0x170500
> [ 1464.219451] hda-intel 0000:00:14.2: spurious response 0x0:0x0, last cmd=0x170500
> [ 1464.219454] hda-intel 0000:00:14.2: spurious response 0x0:0x0, last cmd=0x170500
> ...
>
> Ratelimit the message to reduce the dmesg log noise.
>
> Coalesce the format while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Thanks, applied.
BTW, which hardware shows this problem?
I'm interested rather in that...
Takashi
> ---
> sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> index 6e61a01..6e444ca 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> @@ -906,12 +906,12 @@ static void azx_update_rirb(struct azx *chip)
> chip->rirb.res[addr] = res;
> smp_wmb();
> chip->rirb.cmds[addr]--;
> - } else
> - snd_printk(KERN_ERR SFX "%s: spurious response %#x:%#x, "
> - "last cmd=%#08x\n",
> + } else if (printk_ratelimit()) {
> + snd_printk(KERN_ERR SFX "%s: spurious response %#x:%#x, last cmd=%#08x\n",
> pci_name(chip->pci),
> res, res_ex,
> chip->last_cmd[addr]);
> + }
> }
> }
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists