[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131107223046.GK1962@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:30:46 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] wire up CPU features to udev based module loading
> - the module aliases host tool has no arch specific dependencies at
> all except having x86cpu as one of the entries: would you mind
> dropping the x86 prefix there? Or rather add dependencies on $ARCH?
> (If we drop it there, we basically end up with 'cpu:' everywhere)
Should be fine.
> - in the vendor/family/model case, it may be preferable to drop these
> fields entirely from certain modules' aliases if they match on 'any'
> (provided that the module tools permit this) rather than add
> architecture, variant, revision, etc fields for all architectures if
> they can only ever match on one
The module tools require everything matching with the same wild cards.
So I don't know how "any" would work.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists