[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGa+x85AJ6e4W3S73cv_ZJtb+uCLYTMk_DPmQO3Nj656-7QJMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:29:38 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, mans@...sr.com,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Embeddable Position Independent Executable
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com> wrote:
> This patch adds support for and demonstrates the usage of an embedded
> position independent executable (PIE). The goal is to allow the use of C
> code in situations where carefully written position independent assembly
> was previously required.
Hmm, I thought I had already replied to this but it appears that I haven't.
I really like this approach and think it's a major improvement on what
we're already doing on OMAP and a few other ARM platforms. This
approach is done in a way that's significantly easier to maintain and
extend IMO.
As a next step, I think you should drop the RFC and split it up into a
few series that can go via the right trees:
- asm-generic and lib/devres (patches 1, 2, 4)
- drivers/sram (patch 3)
- generic PIE: (patch 5)
- core PIE: (patch 5-8)
- AM33xx support (patch 9-11)
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists