[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131108072732.GA27537@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 23:27:32 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 05:58:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> After merging the userns tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/namei.c: In function 'covered':
> fs/namei.c:3528:2: error: too many arguments to function '__lookup_mnt'
> is_covered = d_mountpoint(dentry) && __lookup_mnt(mnt, dentry, 1);
> ^
>
> Caused by my incomplete merge resolution between commits 474279dc0f77
> ("split __lookup_mnt() in two functions") from the vfs tree and
> a3b4491433f2 ("vfs: Don't allow overwriting mounts in the current mount
> namespace") from the userns tree.
Btw, I don't think the userns tree has any business touching lookup
and mount semantics in namei.c without an explicit VFS signoff.
Please drop the tree for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists