[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131108074445.GA11595@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 23:44:45 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:39:59PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:33:24PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The changes for direct I/O from kernel space have been in for a long
> > time, and they are blocking multiple consumers of the interface from
> > getting submitted for about a year now. Even if the guts of the
> > direct-io code will get a write based on another patchset from Kent
> > that will go on top of the immutable iovec changes we need the
> > interfaces now and not another year down the road.
>
> What else is blocked on this patch series? Honest question.
>From me alone:
Support for ecryptfs to not double cache.
AIO support for target_core_file.
To replace code in staging:
Removal of the lustre-specific loop driver.
And I remember others claiming to want to submit bits, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists