[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C3050A4DBA34F345975765E43127F10F1C08B2F6@szxeml512-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 09:58:19 +0000
From: Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@...ilicon.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"Wanglin (Albert)" <albert.wanglin@...ilicon.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: cmdlinepart: use cmdline partition parser lib
> Such results was never posted and unless we see those, I think
> I'd rather NACK this patch instead. I like the cleanup, but only
> if it's guaranteed to _not_ brake things, specially when dealing
> with a kernel parameter.
Do you have some test case or test standard for me perform.
> --
> Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists