[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383920517.4964.104.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:21:57 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL + CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL = nogo
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 06:03 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:26:28PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 04:37 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:31:20AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:23 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > An untested patch that gets rid of the RCU_SOFTIRQs in this case is below.
> > > >
> > > > Yup, toasted.
> > >
> > > You lost me on this one. If my patch broke your system, any chance of
> > > any diagnostic information?
> >
> > No no, the RCU_SOFTIRQs are toast, history, gone.
>
> Ah, I do like that outcome much better! ;-) The scheduling-clock
> interrupts are gone (or at least reduced) as well?
No, tick shutdown needs encouragement to succeed, but there were no
RCU_SOFTIRQs on rcu_nocbs= CPUs.
> And does this mean that I can have your Tested-by?
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists