linux-kernel - Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL + CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131108160322.GB11112@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:03:24 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL + CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL = nogo

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:45:34AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:29:38PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 06:03:31AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:26:28PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 04:37 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: 
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:31:20AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 19:23 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > An untested patch that gets rid of the RCU_SOFTIRQs in this case is below.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yup, toasted.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You lost me on this one.  If my patch broke your system, any chance of
> > > > > any diagnostic information?
> > > > 
> > > > No no, the RCU_SOFTIRQs are toast, history, gone.
> > > 
> > > Ah, I do like that outcome much better!  ;-)  The scheduling-clock
> > > interrupts are gone (or at least reduced) as well?
> > > 
> > > And does this mean that I can have your Tested-by?
> > 
> > What's wrong with Toasted-by: ?  ;)
> 
> Does this mean that I can have your Toasted by?  ;-)

Sure that was assumed ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/