[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527D3318.2050003@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:53:12 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
On 11/08/13 08:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:58:42AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 11:20 Thu 07 Nov , Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> @@ -381,6 +384,13 @@ static void __init cpuid_init_hwcaps(void)
>>> elf_hwcap |= HWCAP_IDIVT;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL) && elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVT)
>>> + if (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVT)
>>> +#else
>>> + if (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVA)
>>> +#endif
> Take another look, and you'll see the change that you're suggesting is
> wrong. Instead, the following may be a more reasonable suggestion as
> a suitable replacement:
>
> if (elf_hwcap & (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL) ?
> HWCAP_IDIVT : HWCAP_IDIVA))
I can use IS_ENABLED() but I'd prefer a local variable to make it
simpler in the conditional.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists