linux-kernel - Re: common location for devicetree files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:33:00 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: common location for devicetree files

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> As we start having more sharing of device trees between architectures (arm & arm64, arm & powerpc, guessing maybe mips & arm) we need dts to live in location that
>
> I was wondering what people felt about doing:
>
>         arch/dts/<VENDOR>/
>
> as a common location that could be shared.  I'm up for other suggestions.

dts isn't an architecture, so having it directly under arch/ doesn't
make sense. I know it's the first common parent of a lot of platforms
though.

I'd be ok with adding a toplevel dts/ directory for this, for lack of
better options. It doesn't really fit under firmware, lib, kernel,
scripts, tools...


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/