[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgyqXS8tq0Ru=ibypV89-oAJ8bzxhdFTnSAvfOobEC+Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:33:00 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: common location for devicetree files
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> As we start having more sharing of device trees between architectures (arm & arm64, arm & powerpc, guessing maybe mips & arm) we need dts to live in location that
>
> I was wondering what people felt about doing:
>
> arch/dts/<VENDOR>/
>
> as a common location that could be shared. I'm up for other suggestions.
dts isn't an architecture, so having it directly under arch/ doesn't
make sense. I know it's the first common parent of a lot of platforms
though.
I'd be ok with adding a toplevel dts/ directory for this, for lack of
better options. It doesn't really fit under firmware, lib, kernel,
scripts, tools...
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists