[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <527FDB50.1050902@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:15:28 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@...gle.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
CC: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: iwlwifi: remove minor dead code
Hello.
On 10-11-2013 23:06, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> inta is checked to be zero in a IRQ_NONE branch so afterwards it
> cannot be zero as it is never modified.
> Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c
> index 3f237b4..c32122a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/rx.c
[...]
> @@ -1150,7 +1149,13 @@ static irqreturn_t iwl_pcie_isr(int irq, void *data)
> * or due to sporadic interrupts thrown from our NIC. */
> if (!inta) {
> IWL_DEBUG_ISR(trans, "Ignore interrupt, inta == 0\n");
> - goto none;
> + /* re-enable interrupts here since we don't have anything to
> + * service. only Re-enable if disabled by irq and no
> + * schedules tasklet. */
The preferred way of formatting the multi-line comments in the networking
code is this:
/* bla
* bla
*/
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists