[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131110161049.GA17019@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:10:49 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Cc: opw-kernel <opw-kernel@...glegroups.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchand@...hat.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OPW kernel] Re: [PATCH v10] Staging: zram: Fix memory leak by
refcount mismatch
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:26:15PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 07:36:09PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> >> As suggested by Minchan Kim and Jerome Marchand "The code in reset_store
> >> get the block device (bdget_disk()) but it does not put it (bdput()) when
> >> it's done using it. The usage count is therefore incremented but never
> >> decremented."
> >>
> >> This patch also puts bdput() for all error cases.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> >> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This revision fixes the following issue of the previous revision-
> >> Incorrect Subject Line
> >
> > I'm a bit confused now, I see three different zram patches from you,
> > with different subjects, are they all now just in one patch, this one?
> >
> > Can you just send me the outstanding zram patches that you have gotten
> > acks from that you want applied, as I'm lost here.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg "easily confused" k-h
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> You have already applied the rest two patches for this driver. This is
> the only patch which is left.
>
> But I think you might have problem applying this because there have
> been changes in previous patches later i.e you applied v8 of this
> series, while, maintainers later suggested to change more and hence v9
> was also introduced.
>
> Therefore, v9's patch 1 and v10 patch is correct to be applied in the tree.
Hm, can you please resend them, as I no longer have them in my queue.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists