[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:13:56 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7 v2] kexec kernel efi runtime support
On 11/08/13 at 09:01pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/08/2013 07:57 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, if CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_PARAMS is not set, then kexec-tools should
> > fail getting efi_info, so I will fix kexec-tools patch about this.
> >
> > Also CONFIG_EFI_RUNTIME_MAP should select CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_PARAMS.
> > In future will try to move the boot params data out of debugfs.
> >
>
> Honestly, if we need debugfs to get actual functionality, it shouldn't
> be in sploit^Wdebugfs...
>
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> created the debugfs file for boot_params.
His first version patch tried sysfs, but sysfs is not designed for such
binary blobs so finally it go to debugfs.
Any idea for this is welcome, till now I have no better idea for such kind
of data. We should have another *fs instead of using debugfs.
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists