[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131111203954.GB3043@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:39:54 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Kamala R <kamala@...stanetworks.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPv6: Blackhole route support partial ?
Hello!
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:25:14PM +0530, Kamala R wrote:
> On adding IPv6 blackhole routes, ICMP unreachable messages are being
> sent back to source. According to the definition, packets destined to
> a blackhole address must be dropped silently.
Yes, this is a bug.
> I applied the patch submitted to the 3.7 kernel that indicates that it
> supports blackhole and prohibit routes correctly. However, the patch
> only sets the error code and route type correctly, so the show command
> displays the appropriate output.
>
>
> It seems to me that the input and output function pointers of the dst
> variable, which determine packet processing, need to be set to
> dst_discard. This would enable correct behaviour for blackhole routes.
> Am I on the right path here ?
I think you are. ip6_pkt_discard is not the correct input/output
function for blackhole routes. In ip6_route_add simply set up the
function pointers in the switch instead to just initializing them to
ip6_pkt_discard. dst_discard is fine. Looks like prohibit rules are not
handled correctly either. They should go to ip6_pkt_prohibit. (Just look at
how the templates are initialized.)
Could you cook a patch?
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists