lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:31:23 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Corrupted low memory in v3.9+

On 11/11/2013 03:35 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> If we reserve everything in low memory, all the time (which I very much 
> argue we should do) then the checker becomes a no-op and can be removed.
> 

Oops!  I had misunderstood how the checker worked -- I thought it
checked the *reserved* memory, but it in fact reserves memory
*independently* and then checks it.

The problem is fundamentally that setup_bios_corruption_check(); is
called too early in setup_arch() -- quite possibly due to other code
movement around it:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_CHECK_BIOS_CORRUPTION
	setup_bios_corruption_check();
#endif

	reserve_real_mode();

	trim_platform_memory_ranges();
	trim_low_memory_range();

	init_mem_mapping();


setup_bios_corruption_check() should presumably be called between
trim_low_memory_range() and init_mem_mapping().  I'm actually surprised
that we don't trip on this *all the time* since the realmode trampoline
falls in this area...

At the same time, we should change the default for
CONFIG_X86_RESERVE_LOW to 640, and perhaps move it under EXPERT.

What do you guys think?

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ