[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5281D3B8.2030104@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:07:36 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] perf tests: Use lower sample_freq in sw clock event
period test
On 11/11/13 22:22, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>
> We were using it at 10 kHz, which doesn't work in machines where somehow
> the max freq was auto reduced by the kernel:
>
> [root@...andy ~]# perf test 19
> 19: Test software clock events have valid period values : FAILED!
> [root@...andy ~]# perf test -v 19
> 19: Test software clock events have valid period values :
> --- start ---
> Couldn't open evlist: Invalid argument
> ---- end ----
> Test software clock events have valid period values: FAILED!
> [root@...andy ~]#
>
> [root@...andy ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
> 7000
>
> Reducing it to 500 Hz should be good enough for this test and also
> shouldn't affect what it is testing.
>
> But warn the user if it fails, informing the knob and the freq tried.
Doesn't work for me:
./perf test -v 19
19: Test software clock events have valid period values :
--- start ---
mmap size 528384B
mmap size 528384B
All (0) samples have period value of 1!
---- end ----
Test software clock events have valid period values: FAILED!
But this fixes it:
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c b/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c
index 93a7139..6664a7c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
#include "util/cpumap.h"
#include "util/thread_map.h"
-#define NR_LOOPS 1000000
+#define NR_LOOPS 10000000
/*
* This test will open software clock events (cpu-clock, task-clock)
>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-548rhj1uo6xbwnxa95kw3hqe@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c b/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c
> index ed777728dfe7..93a7139ff5f7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id)
> .freq = 1,
> };
>
> - attr.sample_freq = 10000;
> + attr.sample_freq = 500;
>
> evlist = perf_evlist__new();
> if (evlist == NULL) {
> @@ -58,8 +58,11 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id)
> }
>
> if (perf_evlist__open(evlist)) {
> + const char *knob = "/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate";
> +
> err = -errno;
> - pr_debug("Couldn't open evlist: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> + pr_debug("Couldn't open evlist: %s\nHint: check %s, using %" PRIu64 " in this test.\n",
> + strerror(errno), knob, (u64)attr.sample_freq);
> goto out_delete_maps;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists