[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5281EA5F.3080604@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:44:15 +1300
From: schmitz <schmitz@...phys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] hardirq: Make hardirq bits generic
Thomas,
>
>>
>> If you look at the probability of the first two checks catching
>> anything, then it's pretty low. Most interrupts returns go through
>> ret_from_exception. Yes, I added counters which prove that at least on
>> the aranym, but I doubt that it will make a real difference if you run
>> this on real hardware.
>
> I'm happy to try that (indeed, verify your patch works on Atari
> hardware first) - I trust the patch is relative to m68k git, not your
> previous patches?
Pleased to report the patch works, as expected, on the actual hardware.
I doubt we still need to profile the interrupt return path, Geert?
Cheers,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists