linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARC: Add perf support for ARC700 cores

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E6BF041E97966E4DB955F0DF883AD2D685F17276@de02wembxa.internal.synopsys.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:15:12 +0000
From:	Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARC: Add perf support for ARC700 cores

Hi Peter,

> > Please find v3 of my attempt to add support for perf for ARC700 PMU's.
> > If possible, it would be nice to get some feedback on the
> > implementation from non-ARC/Synopsys people familiar with the perf
> subsystem in Linux.
> 
> Anything in particular you wanted feedback on? It looks like a fairly
> straight fwd thingy.

This may just be my lack of experience with kernel etiquette; the patch
works OK for us, but it would be a bit strange if Vineet would just apply
it without any discussion on the mailing list. So thanks for having taken
the time to look at it!

Mischa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/