[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131112104129.GH4971@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:41:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
Morten.Rasmussen@....com, cmetcalf@...era.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
alex.shi@...el.com, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, rjw@...k.pl,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@....net, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, l.majewski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 07/14] sched: get CPU's activity statistic
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:52:20PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> +static int get_cpu_activity(int cpu)
> +{
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> + u32 sum = rq->avg.runnable_avg_sum;
> + u32 period = rq->avg.runnable_avg_period;
> +
> + sum = min(sum, period);
> +
> + if (sum == period) {
> + u32 overload = rq->nr_running > 1 ? 1 : 0;
> + return available_of(cpu) + overload;
> + }
> +
> + return (sum * available_of(cpu)) / period;
I'm thinking this has a fair potential to overflow our u32, no?
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists