lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131112113427.GA4053@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:34:27 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] perf machine: Introduce synthesize_threads method
 out of open coded equivalent

Em Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:50:45PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:

> > On 11/11/13, 1:22 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >+	if (perf_target__has_task(target))
> > >+		return perf_event__synthesize_thread_map(tool, threads, process, machine, data_mmap);
> > >+	else if (perf_target__has_cpu(target))
> > >+		return perf_event__synthesize_threads(tool, process, machine, data_mmap);

> > Getting kind of long on the line lengths...

> Maybe we could start losing most of the perf_ prefixes - it's all about 
> perf here, so it does not really add much information, does it?

In some cases that is ok, that is why I didn't call it 'perf_machine',
just 'machine', in others, like 'perf_event', I thought 'event' would be
too general when somebody tries to use this code together with other
libraries.

In some cases, like 'perf_target', probably its ok to move to
'target', perhaps this is ok for this problem domain, i.e.
monitoring/profiling/etc.
 
> that would turn it into:
> 
> 	if (target__has_task(target))
> 		return event__synthesize_thread_map(tool, threads, process, machine, data_mmap);
> 	else if (target__has_cpu(target))
> 		return event__synthesize_threads(tool, process, machine, data_mmap);
> 
> Another trick would be to combine (tool, machine) into a single helper 
> struct (struct context *ctx?), if that is mostly a constant combination 
> describing tool environment, which gets passed deep inside the guts of 
> functions.


Reducing the function signature is something that may help as well, and
was done in this series with machine__synthesize_threads, that avoids
passing the tool and process arguments, since they were constanty
anyway.

What you propose is used in some cases, like with symbol_conf, will try
to work in that direction as time goes by, i.e. doing some refactoring
work of this kind every once in a while, not to disrupt too much the
patch flow.
 
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ