[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131112115230.GD12849@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:52:30 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/boot changes for v3.13
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Hm, I think it's actually a bonus that we see the individual CPUs
> printed as they boot up. That way if there's a hang, the place where
> it hangs is apparent, etc.
Ok, good point.
We can do something like that then:
[ 0.068574] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[ 0.069006] .... node #1, CPUs: #1
[ 0.147005] .... node #0, CPUs: #2 #3
[ 0.147005] .... node #1, CPUs: #4 #5
[ 0.445273] x86: Booted up 2 nodes, 6 CPUs
and report (node, core) in the order they appear.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists