lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:07:14 +0400
From:	Evgeny Boger <>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <>
CC:	"" <>,
	David Fries <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add strong pullup emulation to w1-gpio master driver.

+David Fries <>

Hi David,

Would you please comment on this?

11/12/2013 05:03 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov:
> Hi
> 12.11.2013, 03:32, "Evgeny Boger" <>:
>>> Why did you drop this check? It has nothing with w1-gpio driver
>> This check prevents master from implementing "set_pullup"  provided it does support only "write_bit" method.
>> The comment above states that
>>>   w1_io.c would need to support calling set_pullup before - * the last write_bit operation of a w1_write_8 which it currently - * doesn't.
>> which is kind of strange, since it describes what w1_io.c actually does support.
>> w1_write_8 (w1_io.c:154,
>>>                  for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
>>>                          if (i == 7)
>>>                                  w1_pre_write(dev);
>>>                          w1_touch_bit(dev, (byte >> i) & 0x1);
>>>                  }
>> It seems like w1_write_8() calls w1_pre_write(), which in turn calls set_pullup() just before the last write_bit().
>> I'm not sure why this check was there in the first place.
> Please add author of those lines to clarify things.
> This doesn't look obvious to me

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists