[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1384259405-7913-1-git-send-email-mpn@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:30:05 +0100
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@...gle.com>
To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Cc: cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gfs2: fix potential NULL pointer dereference
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Commit [e66cf1610: GFS2: Use lockref for glocks] replaced call:
atomic_read(&gi->gl->gl_ref) == 0
with:
__lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref)
therefore changing how gl is accessed, from gi->gl to plan gl.
However, gl can be a NULL pointer, and so gi->gl needs to be
used instead (which is guaranteed not to be NULL because fo
the while loop checking that condition).
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index e66a800..c8420f7 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -1899,7 +1899,8 @@ static int gfs2_glock_iter_next(struct gfs2_glock_iter *gi)
gi->nhash = 0;
}
/* Skip entries for other sb and dead entries */
- } while (gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd || __lockref_is_dead(&gl->gl_lockref));
+ } while (gi->sdp != gi->gl->gl_sbd ||
+ __lockref_is_dead(&gi->gl->gl_lockref));
return 0;
}
--
1.8.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists