[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131111153002.722CCC4191F@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:30:02 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: Add MOXA RTL8201CP PHY support
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:51:24 -0800, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> 2013/11/4 Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>:
> > This is why I ended up setting PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT and the comment
> > about its effectiveness. Polling works but the extra reads on the bus
> > seem unnecessary.
> > Ideas how they can be eliminated are appreciated.
>
> As of today, the only way to work around it is not to use
> of_mdiobus_register() and use mdiobus_register() directly which will
> allow you to properly describe such a configuration.
of_mdiobus_register() can be changed. One option: If the caller knows
what it wants to happen in the case of no interrupt, then it can be
added as an argument to of_mdiobus_register(). No need to work around
this in an ugly way.
Is setting the irq to PHY_POLL something that should be done for the
entire bus, or only for a handful of PHYs?
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists