[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5282A3E2.30103@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:55:46 -0500
From: Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kallsyms: Revert back to 128 max symbol length
On 11/11/2013 09:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:40:36PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> This reverts commits
>> f3462aa (Kbuild: Handle longer symbols in kallsyms.c) and
>> eea0e9c (kbuild: Increase kallsyms max symbol length)
>> except for the added overflow check. The reason is a regression caused
>> by increasing the buffer:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138387700415675.
>
> Can you please wait a bit until we tracked down the problem?
>
>
> -Andi
>
Andi:
Don Zickus and I have been trying to reproduce the problem with
the config file Fengguang Wu sent to us, but so far have been unsuccessful.
Given there are 5 other locations in the code that need to be changed
from [128] to [KSYM_NAME_LEN], and that we still haven't found Fengguang's
problem yet, I'd be in favor of letting Michal's revert patch 2/2 go forward.
That would give us time to find the issue Fengguang reported.
Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists