[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131113125149.GB28192@saruman.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:51:49 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, <paul@...an.com>,
<rnayak@...com>, <khilman@...aro.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: maintain sane runtime pm
status around suspend/resume
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 05:08:30PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> index b69dd9a..f97b34b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>
> if (!ret && !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) {
> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
don't you have to disable pm_runtime around status changes ? Or is
pm_runtime already disabled by the time we get here ?
> @@ -634,10 +635,10 @@ static int _od_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct omap_device *od = to_omap_device(pdev);
>
> - if ((od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) &&
> - !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> + if (od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) {
> od->flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
> omap_device_enable(pdev);
> + pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
ditto, also pm_runtime_set_active() may fail.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists