linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the aio-direct tree with the btrfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131113130507.b4a99df2f2c2a860bc320bab@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:05:07 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the aio-direct tree with the btrfs tree

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the aio-direct tree got a conflict in
fs/btrfs/inode.c between commit 0ef8b726075a ("Btrfs: return an error
from btrfs_wait_ordered_range") from the btrfs tree and commit
921057174f1c ("dio: Convert direct_IO to use iov_iter") from the
aio-direct tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/btrfs/inode.c
index da8d2f696ac5,6feae86d24df..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@@ -7234,10 -7233,8 +7247,10 @@@ static ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(int rw, 
  	 * call btrfs_wait_ordered_range to make absolutely sure that any
  	 * outstanding dirty pages are on disk.
  	 */
- 	count = iov_length(iov, nr_segs);
+ 	count = iov_iter_count(iter);
 -	btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, offset, count);
 +	ret = btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, offset, count);
 +	if (ret)
 +		return ret;
  
  	if (rw & WRITE) {
  		/*

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped