linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131113144010.GB3538@lukather>
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:40:10 +0100
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
Cc:	balbi@...com, mturquette@...aro.org, james.hogan@...tec.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: add flags to distinguish xtal clocks

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > What I'm not really convinced about is *how* you carry that metadata
> > in the DT, that's all, nothing more.
> 
> Okay, I get you.  My point is that being a crystal or not *is* a
> characteristic of the clock, so I think it could be part of the flags
> that describe it.

Yeah, but then, a crystal has a slightly different behaviour and
property than a oscillator, therefore the two aren't fully
"compatible" with each other.

> In any case, it's not really my call.  This is about the clock and it's
> not even my home turf (wireless). ;)
> 
> Thanks for your comments.  And I'm sorry if the tone of my previous
> email sounded harsh, it was not supposed to. :)

That's fine, don't worry :)

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)