[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131113111257.482c2955@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:12:57 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>, john.stultz@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mwhitehe@...hat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: nohz problem with idle time on old hardware
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:07:18 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Right. It's telling you if NOHZ is enabled. It's not telling you that
> NOHZ is active.
Yeah, which makes this code rather silly:
in rcu_prepare_for_idle():
/* Handle nohz enablement switches conservatively. */
tne = ACCESS_ONCE(tick_nohz_enabled);
if (tne != rdtp->tick_nohz_enabled_snap) {
if (rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu, NULL))
invoke_rcu_core(); /* force nohz to see update. */
rdtp->tick_nohz_enabled_snap = tne;
return;
}
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists