[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1384363093-8025-1-git-send-email-snanda@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:18:13 -0800
From: Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.cz, rientjes@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, semenzato@...gle.com,
murzin.v@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, dserrg@...il.com,
msb@...omium.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6] mm, oom: Fix race when selecting process to kill
The selection of the process to be killed happens in two spots:
first in select_bad_process and then a further refinement by
looking for child processes in oom_kill_process. Since this is
a two step process, it is possible that the process selected by
select_bad_process may get a SIGKILL just before oom_kill_process
executes. If this were to happen, __unhash_process deletes this
process from the thread_group list. This results in oom_kill_process
getting stuck in an infinite loop when traversing the thread_group
list of the selected process.
Fix this race by adding a pid_alive check for the selected process
with tasklist_lock held in oom_kill_process.
Signed-off-by: Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 5 +++++
mm/oom_kill.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e27baee..8975dbb 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2156,6 +2156,11 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
#define do_each_thread(g, t) \
for (g = t = &init_task ; (g = t = next_task(g)) != &init_task ; ) do
+/*
+ * Careful: while_each_thread is not RCU safe. Callers should hold
+ * read_lock(tasklist_lock) across while_each_thread loops.
+ */
+
#define while_each_thread(g, t) \
while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 6738c47..0d1f804 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -412,31 +412,33 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+ if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
+ dump_header(p, gfp_mask, order, memcg, nodemask);
+
+ task_lock(p);
+ pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %d or sacrifice child\n",
+ message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
+ task_unlock(p);
+
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+
/*
* If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
* its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
*/
- if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
+ if (p->flags & PF_EXITING || !pid_alive(p)) {
set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
put_task_struct(p);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
return;
}
- if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
- dump_header(p, gfp_mask, order, memcg, nodemask);
-
- task_lock(p);
- pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %d or sacrifice child\n",
- message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
- task_unlock(p);
-
/*
* If any of p's children has a different mm and is eligible for kill,
* the one with the highest oom_badness() score is sacrificed for its
* parent. This attempts to lose the minimal amount of work done while
* still freeing memory.
*/
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
do {
list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
unsigned int child_points;
@@ -456,12 +458,17 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
}
}
} while_each_thread(p, t);
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- rcu_read_lock();
p = find_lock_task_mm(victim);
+
+ /*
+ * Since while_each_thread is currently not RCU safe, this unlock of
+ * tasklist_lock may need to be moved further down if any additional
+ * while_each_thread loops get added to this function.
+ */
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+
if (!p) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
put_task_struct(victim);
return;
} else if (victim != p) {
@@ -487,6 +494,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
* That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a
* pending fatal signal.
*/
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process(p)
if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) &&
!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
--
1.8.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists