linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: append SFI helpers for GPIO API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5283B9AC.8010705@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:41:00 -0800
From:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: append SFI helpers for GPIO API

On 11/13/2013 04:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 19:55 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 20:03 -0700, David Cohen wrote:
>>>> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> To support some (legacy) firmwares and platforms let's make life easier for
>>>> their customers.
>>>
>>>> +int sfi_get_gpio_by_name(const char *name)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct sfi_gpio_table_entry *pentry = sfi_gpio_table;
>>>> +     int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (!pentry)
>>>> +             return -1;
>>>
>>> ^^^^ It seems an old version.
>>>
>>> New version was published while ago and even has an ACK from Linus:
>>>
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1545960.html
>>
>> So what is happening to this thing?
>
> Actually David now coordinates work done for Medfield & Co.
> Perhaps he is not absent and could answer fast to this.
>
>> Is there some newer patch I should be merging?
>
> I'm pretty sure there is no newest version of patch.

Yeah, there is no newer version.
Linus, you're free to stick with the version pointed out by Andy on
this thread:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1545960.html

Br, David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/