lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1384373671-12814-2-git-send-email-david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:14:29 -0800
From:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	matthew.garrett@...ula.com
Cc:	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.ernst@...ux.intel.com,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ipc: Added platform data structure

From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>

Since the same ipc driver can be used by many platforms, using
macros for defining ipc_base and i2c_base addresses is not
a scalable approach. So added a platform data structure to pass
this information.

Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
index d654f831410d..cc8e4c7d3629 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
@@ -58,12 +58,29 @@
  *    message handler is called within firmware.
  */
 
-#define IPC_BASE_ADDR     0xFF11C000	/* IPC1 base register address */
-#define IPC_MAX_ADDR      0x100		/* Maximum IPC regisers */
 #define IPC_WWBUF_SIZE    20		/* IPC Write buffer Size */
 #define IPC_RWBUF_SIZE    20		/* IPC Read buffer Size */
-#define IPC_I2C_BASE      0xFF12B000	/* I2C control register base address */
-#define IPC_I2C_MAX_ADDR  0x10		/* Maximum I2C regisers */
+
+enum {
+	SCU_IPC_LINCROFT,
+};
+
+/* intel scu ipc driver data*/
+struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t {
+	u32 ipc_base;
+	u32 i2c_base;
+	u32 ipc_len;
+	u32 i2c_len;
+};
+
+static struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t intel_scu_ipc_pdata[] = {
+	[SCU_IPC_LINCROFT] = {
+		.ipc_base = 0xff11c000,
+		.i2c_base = 0xff12b000,
+		.ipc_len = 0x100,
+		.i2c_len = 0x10,
+	},
+};
 
 static int ipc_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id);
 static void ipc_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev);
@@ -504,12 +521,16 @@ static irqreturn_t ioc(int irq, void *dev_id)
  */
 static int ipc_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 {
-	int err;
+	int err, pid;
+	struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t *pdata;
 	resource_size_t pci_resource;
 
 	if (ipcdev.pdev)		/* We support only one SCU */
 		return -EBUSY;
 
+	pid = id->driver_data;
+	pdata = &intel_scu_ipc_pdata[pid];
+
 	ipcdev.pdev = pci_dev_get(dev);
 
 	err = pci_enable_device(dev);
@@ -527,11 +548,11 @@ static int ipc_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 	if (request_irq(dev->irq, ioc, 0, "intel_scu_ipc", &ipcdev))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
-	ipcdev.ipc_base = ioremap_nocache(IPC_BASE_ADDR, IPC_MAX_ADDR);
+	ipcdev.ipc_base = ioremap_nocache(pdata->ipc_base, pdata->ipc_len);
 	if (!ipcdev.ipc_base)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ipcdev.i2c_base = ioremap_nocache(IPC_I2C_BASE, IPC_I2C_MAX_ADDR);
+	ipcdev.i2c_base = ioremap_nocache(pdata->i2c_base, pdata->i2c_len);
 	if (!ipcdev.i2c_base) {
 		iounmap(ipcdev.ipc_base);
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -564,7 +585,7 @@ static void ipc_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 }
 
 static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(pci_ids) = {
-	{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x082a)},
+	{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x082a), SCU_IPC_LINCROFT},
 	{ 0,}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pci_ids);
-- 
1.8.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ