[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131113232349.GA13970@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:23:49 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/kaslr] x86, kaslr: Provide randomness functions
On Wed 2013-11-13 10:40:40, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 10:16 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > If it is not performance critical, why not use "/dev/random"
> > infrastructure?
> >
>
> Because it doesn't exist yet?
Would it be feasible to initialize /dev/random earlier instead of
reinventing it?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists