[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52842564.4040305@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:20:36 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] kprobes: Remove uneeded kernel dependency
on struct arch_specific_insn
(2013/10/16 6:04), David Long wrote:
> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@...aro.org>
>
> Instead of depending on include/asm/kprobes.h to provide a dummy definition
> for struct arch_specific_insn, do so in include/linux/kprobes.h.
Nak, why do we need ugly #ifdef again there?
And also, please cc to the original maintainers.
Thank you,
>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> index 925eaf2..4b5a74d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
>
> #else /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> typedef int kprobe_opcode_t;
> -struct arch_specific_insn {
> - int dummy;
> -};
> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
>
> struct kprobe;
> @@ -110,7 +107,11 @@ struct kprobe {
> kprobe_opcode_t opcode;
>
> /* copy of the original instruction */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> struct arch_specific_insn ainsn;
> +#else
> + int ainsn;
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Indicates various status flags.
>
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists