[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52842671.40703@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 06:55:05 +0530
From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: do not allow transitions with
regulators suspended
On Wednesday 13 November 2013 08:46 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> arrgh, my bad.. Apologies for the bad one.. I missed it :( Does the following
> look equivalent?
yes.
> With this, I now see:
> [ 43.212714] cpufreq: cpufreq_add_policy_cpu: Failed to stop governor
> ^^^ ??
Ahh, I missed this part. I thought it will fail at some other place where there
is no error checking :), but that's not true.
Following should fix it for you and looks to be the right way as well.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index dc67fa0..30b09d3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1530,6 +1530,14 @@ static void cpufreq_bp_resume(void)
}
}
+ if (has_target()) {
+ if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
+ (ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ }
+
schedule_work(&policy->update);
fail:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists