[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1384446782-13741-3-git-send-email-bergwolf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:32:25 +0800
From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@...atex.com>,
Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/39] staging/lustre/clio: wrong cl_lock usage
From: Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@...atex.com>
granted lock is moved to HELD state in cl_wait_try() only which is
done after upcall for non-agl locks. as the result, lock unuse moves
cl_lock not to CACHED state, but to NEW state. A parallel thread
gets this lock and tries to enqueue it - instead of re-using a
cached lock, cl_enqueue_try() initiates a new enqueue and gets to
osc_lock_enqueue() where it asserts:
LASSERTF(ols->ols_state == OLS_NEW, ...);
the state of osc lock is RELEASED already - moved here by unuse.
Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/6709
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3433
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@...atex.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
index c90abfb..476b2e8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
@@ -554,15 +554,18 @@ static int osc_lock_upcall(void *cookie, int errcode)
lock->cll_flags |= CLF_FROM_UPCALL;
cl_wait_try(env, lock);
lock->cll_flags &= ~CLF_FROM_UPCALL;
- if (!olck->ols_glimpse)
- olck->ols_agl = 0;
}
cl_lock_signal(env, lock);
/* del user for lock upcall cookie */
- cl_unuse_try(env, lock);
+ if (olck->ols_agl) {
+ if (!olck->ols_glimpse)
+ olck->ols_agl = 0;
+ cl_unuse_try(env, lock);
+ }
} else {
/* del user for lock upcall cookie */
- cl_lock_user_del(env, lock);
+ if (olck->ols_agl)
+ cl_lock_user_del(env, lock);
cl_lock_error(env, lock, rc);
}
@@ -1128,8 +1131,9 @@ static int osc_lock_enqueue(const struct lu_env *env,
/* lock will be passed as upcall cookie,
* hold ref to prevent to be released. */
cl_lock_hold_add(env, lock, "upcall", lock);
- /* a user for lock also */
- cl_lock_user_add(env, lock);
+ /* a user for agl lock also */
+ if (ols->ols_agl)
+ cl_lock_user_add(env, lock);
ols->ols_state = OLS_ENQUEUED;
/*
@@ -1147,7 +1151,8 @@ static int osc_lock_enqueue(const struct lu_env *env,
ols, einfo, &ols->ols_handle,
PTLRPCD_SET, 1, ols->ols_agl);
if (result != 0) {
- cl_lock_user_del(env, lock);
+ if (ols->ols_agl)
+ cl_lock_user_del(env, lock);
cl_lock_unhold(env, lock, "upcall", lock);
if (unlikely(result == -ECANCELED)) {
ols->ols_state = OLS_NEW;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists