[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20131114150800.7adc9577@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:08:00 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
Aristeu Rozanski Filho <arozansk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mpc85xx_edac changes for 3.13
Em Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:21:25 +0100
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de> escreveu:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:24:18PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:18:43AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > So, in practice, Borislav was working as a maintainer for amd64 EDAC
> > > patches, and I working mainly as Intel EDAC maintainer. The (few)
> > > other arm EDAC patches were either coming via my tree or via Boris
> > > tree, depending on who got them first.
> >
> > Yeah, and I think this has worked pretty good in the past
Fully agreed.
> > so if you want
> > to, we can continue the same thing of sharing the load on EDAC patches
> > and we both do interim maintainers until Doug steps in.
Works for me.
> >
> > And since it won't change any workflow for Linus, he's probably fine
> > with it too.
> >
> > Yes, no? Comments?
>
> OK for me. For the MPC85xx EDAC I'll do the testing then and either Borislav or
> Mauro send them upstream.
Ok.
Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists