linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131114185132.GQ10317@atomide.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:51:33 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>
Cc:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>, Luciano Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...ginia.edu>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate
 structure

* Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org> [131027 09:15]:
> From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
> 
> Move the wl1251 part of the wl12xx platform data structure into a new
> structure specifically for wl1251.  Change the platform data built-in
> block and board files accordingly.
> 
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c       |  4 +--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wilink_platform_data.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c          | 12 ++++-----
>  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c           |  2 +-
>  include/linux/wl12xx.h                         | 22 ++++++++++++++-
>  6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
> index de1bc6b..24f3c1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static struct spi_board_info omap3pandora_spi_board_info[] __initdata = {
>  
>  static void __init pandora_wl1251_init(void)
>  {
> -	struct wl12xx_platform_data pandora_wl1251_pdata;
> +	struct wl1251_platform_data pandora_wl1251_pdata;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	memset(&pandora_wl1251_pdata, 0, sizeof(pandora_wl1251_pdata));
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static void __init pandora_wl1251_init(void)
>  		goto fail_irq;
>  
>  	pandora_wl1251_pdata.use_eeprom = true;
> -	ret = wl12xx_set_platform_data(&pandora_wl1251_pdata);
> +	ret = wl1251_set_platform_data(&pandora_wl1251_pdata);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto fail_irq;
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> index 65e3627..0d8e7d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ enum {
>  	RX51_SPI_MIPID,		/* LCD panel */
>  };
>  
> -static struct wl12xx_platform_data wl1251_pdata;
> +static struct wl1251_platform_data wl1251_pdata;
>  static struct tsc2005_platform_data tsc2005_pdata;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_SENSORS_LIS3_I2C) || defined(CONFIG_SENSORS_LIS3_I2C_MODULE)

If this is not going into v3.13, these will cause conflicts
with the mach-omap2/board-*.c files for v3.14.

So it might be best to do a minimal header patch first that
can be merged in by both linux-omap and wireless trees.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/