[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWA-9ax=NG_d0tyfzY3+42Ka7_r+jTeF-m5oW0eV8t1=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:22:22 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc: linux@...ts.openrisc.net,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kevin Mehall <contact@...inmehall.net>,
Marek Czerski <ma.czerski@...il.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] openrisc: Add DTS and defconfig for DE0-Nano
Hi Jonas,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se> wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/openrisc/boot/dts/de0_nano.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +/ {
>> + compatible = "opencores,de0_nano";
>
> This should probably be "altera,de0_nano". We also need to put a version
"terasic,de0_nano"? The board says "Designed and manufactured by Terasic".
Hmm, the sticker on the box says "Altera DE0-Nano".
> number of some kind on this thing. How are the de0_nano boards versioned?
That's a good question...
See also Andrew back's email and my response.
The supplied schematics filename is de0-nano-c4-rev-c\(release_cd_rom\).pdf,
and the drawings mention "Rev C".
The block diagram on page 2 still says "EPCS16 (16 Mb), but on page 8 it
mentions "EPCS64", which is what's on my board.
>> + i2c0: ocores@...00000 {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + compatible = "opencores,i2c-ocores";
>
>
> Version number needed. OpenCores wanted "projectname-rtlsvn###" where ###
> is the SVN commit number of the RTL directory in the project's source
> repository.
That's gonna need some information diving, as Stefan's orpsoc git repositories
only contains references to orpsocv2 git-svn-ids, not the svn ids of
the original
component repositories.
>> + gpio0: gpio@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "opencores,jbtrivial";
>
>
> There's no project called 'jbtrivial' at OpenCores. Should this be
> "linux,jbtrivial" to indicate that this refers to a Linux driver?
>
>> + reg = <0x91000000 0x2>;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + xlnx,data-offset = <0>;
>> + xlnx,tri-offset = <1>;
>> + xlnx,gpio-width = <8>;
>
>
> Yuck... I wrote this driver with a similar driver for a Xilinx part as a
> starting point. Apparently I left the Xilenx (xlnx) tags in there for the
> device properties. We can't really have it like this, though.
>
> Like I mentioned earlier, I'd like to see this thing disappear altogether
> and be replaced with gpio-generic.
That needs device-tree support and published bindings first. IIRC, you
had some preliminary code?
Thanks for review!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists